John Joerger wrote
 
>We run many of Collier-Jackson's (now VishionShift) applications.  They
>converted their scrren handling interfaces to JAM over the past few years.
>It gave them a common interface for all applications.
>
>One thing that has been noted by our users is that JAM is *much* slower
>than VIEW.  User perception is a key metric.  In this case, the slow-down
>of the online system is as big a negative as all the other enhancements
>that were gained.
>
I agree twice. JAM is a LOT slower than View and for our CJ users their
complaints on performance outweigh its benefits.
 
[log in to unmask]