Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:12:22 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
start with the second law of therodynamics...
law of biogenesis. life is created by life. not some chemicals.
laws of probability.
read any of the articles at www.drdino.com <http://www.drdino.com>
subscribe to their monthly scientific magazine where numerous articles are
written by scientists with PhD's.
rate of change of salt in ocean. being washed off the earth constantly.
points to 4/5,000 year age.
rate of change of the earth's magnetic field.
over 100 cultures/civilizations of the world with a verbal/written 'flood'
history. Anything past that is impossible to prove due to it's effects on
the earth.
layers of "millions' of year stone, with a fossilized tree trunk thru 3
layers.
read any of the following articles at www.creationism.org/griggs
<http://www.creationism.org/griggs> . Just reading these are enough to make
my point. Lesson 3 points out the number of holes in evolution from the
point of view of the laws of science. lesson 12 points to several things
for a young earth, not an old one. so does lesson 13.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
Points made by others:
yes, it is impossible to totally prove a theory, but entirely possible to
disprove one.
i promised not to use Bible arguments to disprove evolution. scientific
observations/reasoning are enough. however, what you choose to believe is
outside that realm. I choose to belive in a creator and the bible. either
you believe God created universe out of nothing, or it just evolved out of
nothing.
an eye supposedly has evolved 4/5 times. why did it evolve the same way
each time ? talk about a probability jackpot. If an eye's 'screen' were on
the front or outside like a TV, how would the image get sent to the brain ?
is it more protected on the outside/front of eye or the back inside of the
eye protected by bone ? Having suffered a detached retina, or 'screen', i
would venture to say it's more fixable the way it is designed also.
i officiate HS sports. basketball in Indiana. so for over 30 years i have
been 'attacked' verbally to say the least. Using that in no way adds to the
validity of any argument. stick to scientific observations/reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Descarte the noted philosopher stated "it is truth very certain that; when
it is not in our power to determine what is true, we ought to follow what is
most probable"...... everyone makes a choice as to what they think is the
most probable.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|