HP3000-L Archives

November 2003, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NMMGR VALERR 119
From:
"Johnson, Tracy" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Johnson, Tracy
Date:
Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:44:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines) 
O.K. I can live with that, I just wanted to be sure.

BT


Tracy Johnson
MSI Schaevitz Sensors 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schlosser, Robert J [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:35 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] NMMGR VALERR 119
> 
> 
> If I remember correctly, they have to be in different networks. 
> Your 2 addresses are in the same network, 172.20.xx.xx, you will
> need to change one of them if you want to use both nics for network
> traffic.
> 
> Robert Schlosser _ MPE-CSM
> Ochsner Health Plan
> (504) 219-8134 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Tracy [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NMMGR VALERR 119
> Importance: Low
> 
> 
> As I had said, I thought a difference in the last octet would 
> be good enough for the computer to know the difference.
> 
> e.g.:
> 
> B 172.20.11.5   LAN1
> B 172.20.11.6   LAN2 
> 
> 
> 
> BT
> 
> 
> Tracy Johnson
> MSI Schaevitz Sensors 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Craig Lalley [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:22 AM
> > To: Johnson, Tracy; [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: NMMGR VALERR 119
> > 
> > 
> > Tracy,
> > 
> > You need to put the cards on a separate sub-net.
> > 
> > Look at it from the computers point of view, how is the 
> > computer to know which
> > packet goes where?
> > 
> > -Craig
> > 
> > 
> > --- "Johnson, Tracy" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > I have two LANICs, one is the 100MBit the other is the old 10MBit.
> > > 
> > > I had nominally abandoned the old LANIC it was configured 
> > with an unused IP
> > > address.
> > > 
> > > However I got a wild burr today and decided to try and add 
> > it in to the same
> > > segment the 100MBit card is on.
> > > 
> > > The old 10MBit lan is named LAN1.
> > > 
> > > The new 100MBit lan is named LAN2.
> > > 
> > > So, when I VALIDATE in NMMGR, it complains with an error that:
> > > 
> > > "DUPLICATE NETWORK PARTS OF IP ADDRESSES DETECTED (VALERR 119)
> > > 
> > > I thought this should not be a problem, as long as I 
> > configure the last octet
> > > of the IP to be a different number.  Any hints?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > BT
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Tracy Johnson
> > > MSI Schaevitz Sensors 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> > > * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
> > 
> 
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> 
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> 

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2