HP3000-L Archives

September 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Paveza, Gary" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paveza, Gary
Date:
Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:46:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (181 lines)
Sure.  Why don't we also send a public message to the people who killed
thousands of people and ask him to please stop.

People that commit these types of acts do not listen. They have their own
views on the issues and will not change them because of words.  bin Laden
has several times made the statement that in his views there is no
difference between the military and civilians.  He has proven this with
action (if indeed it was him behind this terrible act).  People talk about
the embassy bombings, Lebanon, etc.  Most of these were military targets.
This was an outright terrorist attack on thousands of civilians.  In no way,
shape or form were the twin towers a military target.  And if the reports
about the plane that hit the Pentagon are correct, that plane was originally
for another building.

The sleeping giant has awakened once again.  My only hope is that we show a
little more restraint this time.  Nuclear weapons will not be the solution
and should not even be considered.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Paveza, Jr.
Production Support Analyst - Lead
(302) 761-3173 - voice
(877) 720-2970 - pager

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Cappell, Curtis [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Friday, September 14, 2001 10:37 AM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: [HP3000-L] Violence begets violence.

        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: John Dunlop [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
        >
        > How can it ever be stopped? Surely it is not weakness to show
        > restraint? Violence breeds violence. We need LESS killing in the
        > world, not more.

        Along those lines, here is another perspective:

        the following is an essay by Professor James Garbarino entitled "Our
        Response to the Attack on America: What It Can Teach Children About
        Understanding and Revenge"  if you'd like to know more about
Professor
        Garbarino, you can go to http://esp-nat.tamu.edu/jgarbar.htm

         The September 11 attack on America means many things to America's
children
        and youth.  Much of the initial response by parents, educators, and
mental
        health professionals has focused on coping with the trauma and the
fear.
        But as the days pass and issues of retaliation become the focus of
attention
        a whole new set of issues emerges.  What will our response teach
children
        about revenge and compassion?

         Tibet's Dali Lama is a world leader in teaching about compassion.
One of
        his most important lessons is that "true compassion is not just an
emotional
        response, but a firm commitment founded on reason."  It is easy to
feel
        sympathy of the victims of violence-- human decency demands it. But
it is
        much more difficult to feel true compassion for our enemies--
unshakeable
        understanding of how violence and rage arise in human beings,
understanding
        that endures the bad actions of those human beings.

         I learned this anew in the case of Nathanial Brazil, the 13 year
old boy
        who shot and killed his teacher in Lake Worth, Florida, May 26,
2000. Before
        he committed the murder, most of us would have found it easy to feel
        sympathy for him because of the difficult circumstances of his life.
But
        after his deadly act many people changed their emotional response
from
        sympathy to rage-- and many wished he be executed, or at least
imprisoned
        for life. One friend of the murdered teacher even said in public
that he
        hoped the boy would be raped and tortured every day while he was in
prison.
        This response reveals that the feeling people had for this boy was
        sentimentality not true compassion as the Dali Lama defines it.

         This is an important lesson to consider as our nation responds to
the
        terrorist assault of September 11.  It is quite one thing to talk in
public
        about "bringing the perpetrators to justice" and quite another to
speak of
        exacting our revenge.  It is one thing to understand the origins of
        terrorism and quite another to portray the struggle as simply one of
"evil
        versus good."

         Terrorists typically are caught up in their own scenarios of
revenge and
        retaliation. Often they have experienced personal suffering or
family loss,
        or historical victimization, and are seeking a way to give meaning
to that
        suffering through acts of violent revenge.  Mostly, they are
individuals who
        are offered a political or ideological interpretation for their
situation by
        their leaders. Sometimes these leaders are pathologically
calculating and
        cold in their exploitation of their followers. Sometimes these
leaders
        themselves are plotting revenge for what they have experienced as
victims of
        political oppression. For them, the terrorist acts they commit are
not
        "unprovoked assaults," but rather are their own, sometimes warped
version of
        "bringing the perpetrators to justice."

         All this is not to excuse the terrorist. No one of good faith or
sensitive
        heart could or would do so. But if we are to do more than continue
to
        escalate the cycle of violence we must do more than feel outrage and
        practice more than retaliation. We must seek a deeper
understanding-- of
        individual terrorists and of the causes they represent.  We must not
fear
        this understanding. We must not reject those who ask for
understanding.  We
        must remember the wisdom that teaches, "if you want peace work for
justice."
        And remember what Ghandi taught when he said, "you must be the
change you
        wish to see in the world."

         The coming days and weeks will teach children and youth a great
deal about
        justice, compassion, and revenge.  They will learn lessons from what
our
        government does on our behalf.  Our goal should be to teach them at
least
        three lessons:  First, compassion and understanding are founded in
strength
        not weakness.  Let us celebrate the helpers and those who speak and
act for
        justice and due process rather than for blood revenge. Second,
protecting
        the stigmatized from scape goating and "guilt by association" is an
        important goal of public institutions in a time of national crisis.
In the
        wake of the first Pearl Harbor at the start of World War II we
rounded up
        Japanese-Americans and detained them as suspected enemies of the
state.  We
        must guard against that mentality if it is indeed Arabs and Muslims
who are
        to blame for the catastrophe of September 11.  Third, understanding
and
        compassion in the face of hate and fanaticism are virtues, not
something to
        be afraid of. It is more than a matter of our good and their evil.
        Dehumanization is the enemy. Each individual has a story to tell, a
human
        story. Even as we oppose, hunt for, and bring to justice the
terrorists we
        should remember this. Perhaps we can even understand something about
the
        conditions abroad that give rise to this fanatical hatred of
America.

         Our kids are watching and listening.

        * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
        * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2