Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:03:12 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is meant as an example, I hope no one actually goes and
does this thing without understanding what they are doing.
In general, I leave files in the system account alone,
unless I know how they got there and what they are for.
However, if you are in a user application account, the command
(in its obsolete form) would work fine, I would
just use @.@ or something similar.
In MPEX, a LISTF ,4 will show the actual extent allocation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Garverick [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 10:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Finding files on LDEV 1
Chris Goodey wrote:
> %LISTF @[log in to unmask]@(DEV=1),2
this is a 'good thing'
> ALTFILE @[log in to unmask]@(DEV=1);DEV=2 (move files, that have at least one
> extent on dev 1)
this is a 'bad thing'. some files *have* to live on ldev 1. i believe the
above altfile -- if actually done -- would result in a serious dent being
put
in the poor system manager's tums bottle 8-| - d
--
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631 [log in to unmask]
"Unix _is_ user friendly.
It's just very selective about who its friends are.
And sometimes even best friends have fights."
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
|
|
|