UTCSTAFF Archives

April 1999

UTCSTAFF@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pedro Campa <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 26 Apr 1999 13:43:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
  Dear Colleagues:

There is a scheduled Faculty Meeting tomorrow, Reading Day, Tuesday,
April 27 at 10: 15. Your presence and your vote are needed.

 The implementation document for the UT Board of Trustees' new tenure
policy is coming up for a vote again. If you believe we should vote for
the implementation policy,  ask yourself the following questions:

 - Is the Board's tenure policy and subsequent implementation in the
best interests of this faculty?

 -Do we really believe that the Board's new policy, or the
implementation document strengthen tenure?

 -Was this new tenure policy created with full consultation of this
faculty, in an ethical, professional and collegial manner?

 -Do you believe that the notion of tenure remains untainted as a result
of   the changes made by the UT Board?

 -Should the Faculty pass the implementation document because of fear of
terrible consequences, and devious punitive measures?

 - Why is the administration so eager for us to pass an implementation
to a policy which we had no hand in shaping?

 -Why is the implementation not mandated, just as the Board's new tenure
policy was mandated in June 1998?




 Why we should vote No to the implementation policy:

 -Because if we believe the Board's tenure policy to be unjust and
heavy-handed, to cooperate with its implementation would be dishonest.

 -Because all our requests to change, ammend, or palliate the language
of   the Board's tenure policy have been rejected by UT.

 -Because  we should maintain an ethical posture and not yield to
something we know to be wrong in principle.

 -Because by voting on an implementation procedure we would be
validating the Board's tenure policy in spite of our reservations.

 - Because we should disabuse ourselves from the social fiction that the
new tenure policy and its implementation will be enforced in a collegial
atmosphere.

 -Because the Faculty already voted "NO," and there are not enough
changes in the document that merit new consideration.

 -Because a petition signed by 183 members of the tenured faculty to
delay the adoption of the  new tenure policy was denied by UT.

Professor  P.F.Campa
Dept of Foreign Langs. UTC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2