The article below from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [log in to unmask]
OT perhaps, but an excellent article about technology and investing.
John Lee
Vaske Computer Solutions
[log in to unmask]
/--------- E-mail Sponsored by Fox Searchlight ------------\
GARDEN STATE: NOW PLAYING IN SELECT THEATERS
GARDEN STATE stars Zach Braff, Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard
and Ian Holm. NEWSWEEK's David Ansen says "Writer-Director Zach
Braff has a genuine filmmaker's eye and is loaded with talent."
Watch the teaser trailer that has all of America buzzing and
talk back with Zach Braff on the Garden State Blog at:
http://www.foxsearchlight.com/gardenstate/index_nyt.html
\----------------------------------------------------------/
Seeing Google With the Eyes of Forrest Gump
August 10, 2004
By GARY RIVLIN
Any investor intent on Google might do well to remember
Gump.
When the makers of the 1994 movie "Forrest Gump" sought a
plot device that would render its main character fabulously
rich, they cast him as an early investor in what Forrest
Gump described as "some kind of fruit company": Apple
Computer. By dumb luck, the movie suggested, its guileless
hero had amassed so many millions that he could finance a
Gump Medical Center, build a Baptist church and allow the
family of his fallen friend Bubba to live in luxury.
In the real world, though, Apple would hardly make anyone's
list of Wall Street's greatest hits, despite its
considerable business accomplishments. Like Google today,
Apple was a young but profitable company celebrated by the
media when it made its stock market premiere in December
1980. But because much of its future potential was already
factored into its initial offering price, few other than
the company's founders and its venture capitalists can
boast they got rich off Apple.
Had Forrest Gump bought Apple at the closing price on its
first day as a publicly traded company and held it for five
years, he would have lost more than 30 percent of his
money, said Tim Loughran, a finance professor at the
University of Notre Dame who studies initial public
offerings.
Apple then rebounded, and the stock more than doubled by
the time "Gump" was released, in mid-1994, but Forrest Gump
would have done better in an index fund. Over time,
Professor Loughran said, the company "has gotten absolutely
creamed" by the Standard & Poor's benchmark of the top 500
companies.
"I always have to laugh at Forrest Gump because they never
bothered to check the price," Professor Loughran said.
Wall Street has always had child prodigies that arrive rich
with promise, dating as far back as R.C.A. in 1920 and
peaking in the last decade, when a long list of
technology-related companies went public despite their
youth. The current case, of course, is Google, the popular
Internet search company, which has been expected to go
public soon, although various complications seem to be
making the timing increasingly uncertain. The company said
in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
last month that it expected its shares to sell for $108 to
$135 each, which would make it the most expensive initial
public offering ever per share.
"The problem Apple faced, and the problem a lot of these
companies that start off with all this promise face, is
because they've gotten all this attention, they have a very
high price from the start," Professor Loughran said. "In
the case of Apple, the market pegged it as a company that
would have to hit at least a couple of big home runs just
to justify its original offering price."
It is as if investors are invited to buy into the future
salary potential of a child prodigy - paying a share price
that assumes the prodigy will be making $200,000 a year by
age 30.
Occasionally one of these prodigies lives up to the advance
billing. EBay shares, for example, are up nearly twentyfold
from the price at the end of their first day of trading
back in September 1998. Yet more often than not, according
to stock market veterans and those who study the early
lives of publicly traded companies, the glamour stocks fall
far short of expectations.
"It's a continuous cycle that never stops," said Rod Fadem,
a stockbroker at Stifel Nicolaus & Company in St. Louis,
who has been in the business since 1960. "Every decade
produces these companies that everyone goes nuts over. The
price goes up, up, up, up, but then the price starts to
fall, and everything goes to hell."
The Radio Corporation of America, or R.C.A., was perhaps
the first such stock, said Jeffrey A. Hirsch, editor of the
Stock Trader's Almanac.
"Wall Street went gaga over R.C.A.," he said. And for a
time, the company enriched those who believed in the
commercial potential of radio. The stock soared from $1.50
in 1921 to a high of $549 in 1929.
Two years later, shares in R.C.A. were trading at $2. (Of
course, few stocks fared well in the early aftermath of the
crash of 1929.)
In the 1960's, Mr. Fadem said, Wall Street saw many "puff
stocks," which he defined as newly minted public offerings
sold by issuers as "a fairy tale long on potential and rosy
future earnings estimates." Many were technology stocks,
including University Computing, which leased time on
computer systems; Panacolor, promoted as a Polaroid killer;
and Farrington Manufacturing, an optical equipment maker
that filed for bankruptcy at the start of 1971. Each, he
said, ended up losing a significant amount of money for
those brave or foolish enough to invest.
"They're basically all the same - except the name," Mr.
Fadem said.
A ballyhooed new stock that sticks in the mind of Bruce S.
Foerster, a 30-year investment veteran, is the beer maker
Adolph Coors Company, which went public in 1975. Back then
Coors was distributed only in the Western United States,
and demand for the beer seemed almost without limit - so
much so that Mr. Foerster said "you'd hear about
stewardesses selling bootlegged cases for three times the
price."
"Coors was touted like you wouldn't believe before it
actually went public," said Mr. Foerster, who is the chief
financial officer of Aurora Capital in Sunshine, Fla., and
whose résumé includes turns at PaineWebber and Lehman
Brothers, where he ran the desk responsible for selling
newly issued stocks. "But it never lived up to
expectations."
Shares of Coors opened at $31 and hit a high of $36 that
same year, but then steadily fell, hitting $9.50 a share by
1980. The company's stock did not return to its initial
offering price until 1997.
Boston Chicken was another hot stock when it made its Wall
Street debut. "It had a huge buzz, but it did horrible,"
said Professor Loughran of Notre Dame. Again, the problem
was that much of its future promise was built into its
early stock price.
The company, which later changed its name to Boston Market,
opened at $20 and closed at $48.50 a share the day it went
public in 1993 for a market value of $839 million. Those
who bought the stock at its first-day closing price and
then held it for the next three years, Professor Loughran
said, saw their investment increase by 49 percent. But
those who held on to the stock for five years saw its worth
fall by more than 95 percent, he said. In 1999, McDonald's
paid $173.5 million in cash and assumed debts to buy the
rights to the Boston Market brand and most of the company's
real estate holdings.
To be sure, plenty of initial public offerings have
delivered enormous payouts. An investment in Microsoft at
its first-day closing price of $28 a share in March 1986
would have increased fourteenfold in five years, Professor
Loughran said. And an investment of $10,000 in Microsoft at
the end of its first day of trading would be worth roughly
$3 million today.
Microsoft, however, made a relatively quiet debut on Wall
Street, as did Intel, which went public in 1971, and
Wal-Mart Stores in 1970. "I don't remember any kind of
buildup to Microsoft going public," Mr. Foerster said. A
lack of fanfare, of course, meant a much lower opening
price.
Michael Moe, the chief executive of ThinkEquity Partners, a
research-oriented investment bank specializing in growth
industries, said: "It all comes down to the expectations
built into the price of the stock. A company that has all
the expectation built into the price has to grow at 40 or
50 or 60 percent annually over the next four or five or six
years, and that's exceptionally hard to do."
In fact, only 29 publicly traded companies from a pool of
more than 10,000 could boast that earnings grew by at least
20 percent each year from 1994 to 1999, said Mat Johnson,
who heads ThinkEquity's economic research department.
"Investors should really be looking for the next Wal-Mart,"
Professor Loughran said. "This is a company that didn't
start off with a lot of hype; it didn't start off with a
huge market cap."
Wal-Mart, went public at $16.50 and had a stock market
value of $4.95 million at that point. The company, whose
shares closed yesterday at $51.37 now has stock market
value of $219.3 billion. An investor who spent $1,650 to
buy 100 shares at Wal-Mart's public offering and held them
and retained the additional shares issued through various
splits, now owns stock worth more than $10.5 million. It is
precisely the success of a hidden gem like Wal-Mart that
fuels the rush to buy shares of a stock that dangles the
promise of an enormous payout. "History repeats itself
because people don't change," said Mr. Fadem. "They want to
make the fast buck, they want to be part of some hot stock
that's going to swish up. It's greed at work."
At the start of the 1980's, the prodigy stocks that fueled
dreams of fast profits tended to be personal computer
companies. Besides Apple, there were Commodore Computers
and Kaypro, both now out of business.
"In the early 1980's you had all these hot PC companies
that were like shooting stars," said Fred Hickey, editor of
The High-Tech Strategist newsletter in Nashua, N.H., and a
longtime technology stock analyst. "One of the leading PC
makers at that time, Commodore, went up and up and kept
splitting and splitting. It was a wild momentum stock, but
it imploded fairly quickly. That rocket ride only lasted a
couple of years."
Mr. Hickey watched the same phenomenon play out in the
early 1990's when a long list of network equipment makers
went public. A $10,000 investment in Cisco in March 1990,
when the company first went public, would be worth $2.6
million today. But an investor might just as reasonably
have chosen Wellfleet Communications or Synoptics
Communications instead. Those two companies merged in 1994
to form Bay Networks, which was acquired by Nortel in 1998.
"Cisco was just one among many - no better or worse than
any of them," Mr. Hickey said. "These were all big movers
in their time, but most are now gone. They were bought up
by one company then another, and now collectively they're
worth nothing."
And of course there were the scores of prodigies that made
their Wall Street debut in 1998 and 1999. The most
precocious of all might have been VA Linux Systems, the
seller of computers running Linux, the free software
operating system. Stock in the company, which went public
in December 1999, rose 698 percent on its first day of
trading - a record - to close at $242 a share. The company,
which had never made any money, suddenly had a market value
of more than $9 billion.
By last Friday, shares in the VA Software Corporation, as
the still profitless company is now known, closed at $1.76
a share, down more than 99 percent from that first-day
high. Asked to comment about his company's stock, VA
Software's chairman, Larry M. Augustin, replied, "I think
everything that needs to be said has already been said."
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/10/technology/10google.html?ex=1093166375&ei=1&en=638104b14208c4e1
---------------------------------
Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:
http://homedelivery.nytimes.com/HDS/SubscriptionT1.do?mode=SubscriptionT1&ExternalMediaCode=W24AF
HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[log in to unmask] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo
For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[log in to unmask]
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
