If you are soliciting opinions then, yes, I would really want to have the
missing 3000-L postings brought over to the newsgroup to update us on the
happenings of the last few weeks.  If this is not technically possible, or
perhaps just too much work, I understand, but it is preferred.


David H. Floyd



"Michael L Gueterman" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:395cd68c$1_2@skycache-news.fidnet.com...
> In article <[log in to unmask]>, Roy Brown
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> <snip>
> >I trust you are going to post the backlog of 3000-L mail that
> >comp.sys.hp.mpe has never seen (and vice versa), and not just start as
> >of now?
> >
> >Those of us hanging on in USENET (by preference, in our case) are kind
> >of relying on this.
> >
> Unfortunately no.  I have access to the last few days of comp.sys.hp.mpe
> postings that will flow over to HP3000-L, but only "new" (as of the time I
> kick in the gateway) HP3000-L postings will be posted to the newsgroup.
>
> If people "really" want/need to have the HP3000-L emails that were not
> gated put onto the newsgroup in mass, I'll see what I can do, but I have
no
> easy way to do this at this time.  For those that aren't aware of it, you
> can get to the HP3000-L archives via the web at:
>
> http://raven.utc.edu/Archives/hp3000-l.html
>
> I know its not a substitute for the newsgroup access, but hopefully
> it will suffice.
>
> Regards,
> Michael L Gueterman
> Easy Does It Technologies
> http://www.editcorp.com
> voice: 888-858-3348 (EDIT) or 573-368-5478
> fax:   573-368-5479
> --