If you are soliciting opinions then, yes, I would really want to have the missing 3000-L postings brought over to the newsgroup to update us on the happenings of the last few weeks. If this is not technically possible, or perhaps just too much work, I understand, but it is preferred. David H. Floyd "Michael L Gueterman" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message news:395cd68c$1_2@skycache-news.fidnet.com... > In article <[log in to unmask]>, Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > <snip> > >I trust you are going to post the backlog of 3000-L mail that > >comp.sys.hp.mpe has never seen (and vice versa), and not just start as > >of now? > > > >Those of us hanging on in USENET (by preference, in our case) are kind > >of relying on this. > > > Unfortunately no. I have access to the last few days of comp.sys.hp.mpe > postings that will flow over to HP3000-L, but only "new" (as of the time I > kick in the gateway) HP3000-L postings will be posted to the newsgroup. > > If people "really" want/need to have the HP3000-L emails that were not > gated put onto the newsgroup in mass, I'll see what I can do, but I have no > easy way to do this at this time. For those that aren't aware of it, you > can get to the HP3000-L archives via the web at: > > http://raven.utc.edu/Archives/hp3000-l.html > > I know its not a substitute for the newsgroup access, but hopefully > it will suffice. > > Regards, > Michael L Gueterman > Easy Does It Technologies > http://www.editcorp.com > voice: 888-858-3348 (EDIT) or 573-368-5478 > fax: 573-368-5479 > --