HP3000-L Archives

August 2004, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Art Bahrs <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:15:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
Hi Reid,
     Well, first of all, I think the question you are working on is what is
the risk to the organization of running without logging versus with logging
on a image database.

    Second, the answer is 'It Depends' :)

    Wirt's answer is excellent tho' and definitely provable...

    The calculation of the risk is based on the exposure, type of data,
country where the data physically resides, the facility housing the
mechanisms holding the data, the backup strategies used and so on... you
get the idea :)

     That all said... I would answer that the Risk is infinitly greater
without logging than with... (assumption here is there is no form of
shadowing going on...)

Art 'it must be Friday... I am way too flippant for anyother day of the
week hehe " Bahrs
=======================================================
Art Bahrs, CISSP           Information Security          The Regence Group
(503) 553-1425              FAX (503) 553-1453


|---------+-------------------------------->
|         |           "Reid E. Baxter"     |
|         |           <reid_e_baxter@bankon|
|         |           e.com>               |
|         |           Sent by: "HP-3000    |
|         |           Systems Discussion"  |
|         |           <[log in to unmask]
|         |           DU>                  |
|         |                                |
|         |                                |
|         |           08/13/2004 01:17 PM  |
|         |           Please respond to    |
|         |           reid_e_baxter        |
|         |                                |
|         |           |-------------------||
|         |           | [ ] Secure E-mail ||
|         |           |-------------------||
|---------+-------------------------------->
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                          |
  |      To:    [log in to unmask]                                                                                       |
  |     cc:                                                                                                                  |
  |     Subject:      [HP3000-L] OS-XM-Image Reliability VS Other OS Platforms Solutions                                     |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




I must admit I am quite dumb founded that no one has apparently ever
conducted a study of the reliability of the HP3000 Turbo Image database as
compared to other OS based offerings as I did not receive one reply.

In an effort to solicit any replies, I would like to put forth a another
question to the list, how many times have you encountered an irrecoverable
database corruption situation versus the number of years your experience
covers ?

I am attempting to surmise the 'vulnerability' of a Image database without
logging as opposed to one with logging.

Regards,

Reid E. Baxter

----- Forwarded by Reid E Baxter/OH/ONE on 08/13/2004 04:07 PM -----


                      Reid E Baxter            To:
[log in to unmask]
                                               cc:
                      08/12/2004 01:48         Subject:  OS-XM-Image
Reliability VS Other OS Platforms Solutions
                      PM





Has anyone done a study of the reliability of the 'all in one' vendor (HP)
solution versus other OS platforms and their respective transaction
managers and third party databases ? I am currently attempting to explain
to individuals that are not HP3000 literate the differences. Any input
would be appreciated.  I am specifically looking for reliability
percentages if possible.  Thank you in advance.

Regards,

Reid E. Baxter



This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission
in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *





 =============================================================================
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachment, contains information that may be confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for the entity or individual to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited.  Nothing in this email, including any attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature.
 =============================================================================

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2