HP3000-L Archives

December 2004, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OT: Which side is the media on?
From:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:57:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
and talking about bias, right?
Maybe you should read/watch some different news ;->
Of course if he resigns because he lied, then all politicians incl. GWB
have to resign because they told lies before as well, right?
;-)
Michael

-----------------

There is a big difference between a politician who is expected to take
side, and a news man who is supposed to be objective.

Dan Rather's 'source' was like someone attempting to purchase a car
using monopoly money, and Dan Rather was like a salesman accepting the
money for the purchase as if it was legitimate.  If a salesman did that
he could expect to be fired, if not prosecuted.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2