HP3000-L Archives

August 2004, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:52:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
And a major problem, in my opinion, is that we don't cull enough old
projects/expeditures.  New spending on new projects is good, but spending
that is grandfathered in (was appropriate in an earlier era) has a low
marginal return and needs to be dealt with.

John Lee


At 08:30 PM 8/11/04 -0400, Mark Wonsil wrote:
>> ...This year will mark
>> the third consecutive budget deficit after four straight years of
>surpluses
>> that reflected the economic boom of the 1990s.
>
>And since spending has gone up every single year [1], this proved Ronald
>Reagan's assertion that the way to get out of deficits is to grow out of
>them.  Indeed, spending has gone up tremendously under GWB, but more than
>half of it has been non-military.[2]
>
>Balancing taxes and revenue is a classic feed and speed problem.  In metal
>working (or wood for that matter) if you feed the material too fast, you
>slow the speed of the tool and reduce your overall progress.  If you tax too
>much then the economy slows, if you tax too little, you leave money on the
>table.  Bill Clinton's tax increases came during the beginning of a hot
>economy and raised revenues.   When the stock market bubble burst, the tax
>rate was too high and revenues fell.[1]  The terrorist attacks slowed the
>economy (speed) even more and the taxes were too heavy (feed) to produce the
>same revenue.  This is sometimes called the Laffer curve but the idea behind
>it is not new. [3]
>
>1.)
>http://www.heritage.org/research/features/budgetchartbook/charts_C/c2.html
>or http://tinyurl.com/5y4p5
>2.) http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/BG1703.cfm Or
>http://tinyurl.com/x8b9
>3.) http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm or
>http://tinyurl.com/6xgvj
>
>For those bothered by deficits, one should ask themselves:
>
>Who'll spend more?  A compassionate conservative or a combat liberal?
>
>Mark "IMHO, They all spend too much" W.
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2