HP3000-L Archives

August 2004, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dave Powell, MMfab" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dave Powell, MMfab
Date:
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:20:13 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (177 lines)
We haven't had an Image structural corruption (as opposed to logical
corruption due to Cobol bugs) since the 80s.  Last case was a messed-up
pointer before HP came out with ILR. Don't remember exactly when that was, but
I do remember that we were hoping ILR would prevent future problems and kept
waiting & waiting to see if there would be any.  Still waiting, even though
IRL is now off.

Dave Powell,  MMfab

----- Original Message -----
From: "Penney, John" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 14:34
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OS-XM-Image Reliability VS Other OS Platforms Solu
tions


> Art, Reid, Wirt et al: All that being said and caveat emptor, I have known
> sites that
> a) do(did) not know about Image logging, and
> b) have been running since time immemorial, without same with no discernable
> problems.
>
> Of course, shadowing and logging are good, really good things, mind you,
> esp. shadowing, but all that being said, with a good backup strategy you
> probably won't have an Image failure of any significance for a long time,
> maybe a decade?
>
> John (Shooting from the hip) Penney in Sacto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Art Bahrs [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 2:16 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OS-XM-Image Reliability VS Other OS Platforms
> Solutions
>
>
> Hi Reid,
>      Well, first of all, I think the question you are working on is what is
> the risk to the organization of running without logging versus with logging
> on a image database.
>
>     Second, the answer is 'It Depends' :)
>
>     Wirt's answer is excellent tho' and definitely provable...
>
>     The calculation of the risk is based on the exposure, type of data,
> country where the data physically resides, the facility housing the
> mechanisms holding the data, the backup strategies used and so on... you get
> the idea :)
>
>      That all said... I would answer that the Risk is infinitly greater
> without logging than with... (assumption here is there is no form of
> shadowing going on...)
>
> Art 'it must be Friday... I am way too flippant for anyother day of the week
> hehe " Bahrs =======================================================
> Art Bahrs, CISSP           Information Security          The Regence Group
> (503) 553-1425              FAX (503) 553-1453
>
>
> |---------+-------------------------------->
> |         |           "Reid E. Baxter"     |
> |         |           <reid_e_baxter@bankon|
> |         |           e.com>               |
> |         |           Sent by: "HP-3000    |
> |         |           Systems Discussion"  |
> |         |           <[log in to unmask]
> |         |           DU>                  |
> |         |                                |
> |         |                                |
> |         |           08/13/2004 01:17 PM  |
> |         |           Please respond to    |
> |         |           reid_e_baxter        |
> |         |                                |
> |         |           |-------------------||
> |         |           | [ ] Secure E-mail ||
> |         |           |-------------------||
> |---------+-------------------------------->
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------|
>   |
> |
>   |      To:    [log in to unmask]
> |
>   |     cc:
> |
>   |     Subject:      [HP3000-L] OS-XM-Image Reliability VS Other OS
> Platforms Solutions                                     |
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> I must admit I am quite dumb founded that no one has apparently ever
> conducted a study of the reliability of the HP3000 Turbo Image database as
> compared to other OS based offerings as I did not receive one reply.
>
> In an effort to solicit any replies, I would like to put forth a another
> question to the list, how many times have you encountered an irrecoverable
> database corruption situation versus the number of years your experience
> covers ?
>
> I am attempting to surmise the 'vulnerability' of a Image database without
> logging as opposed to one with logging.
>
> Regards,
>
> Reid E. Baxter
>
> ----- Forwarded by Reid E Baxter/OH/ONE on 08/13/2004 04:07 PM -----
>
>
>                       Reid E Baxter            To:
> [log in to unmask]
>                                                cc:
>                       08/12/2004 01:48         Subject:  OS-XM-Image
> Reliability VS Other OS Platforms Solutions
>                       PM
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone done a study of the reliability of the 'all in one' vendor (HP)
> solution versus other OS platforms and their respective transaction managers
> and third party databases ? I am currently attempting to explain to
> individuals that are not HP3000 literate the differences. Any input would be
> appreciated.  I am specifically looking for reliability percentages if
> possible.  Thank you in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Reid E. Baxter
>
>
>
> This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
> and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
> reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission
> in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================================
> ==
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachment, contains
> information that may be confidential or privileged, and is intended solely
> for the entity or individual to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the
> intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified
> that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message is strictly
> prohibited.  Nothing in this email, including any attachment, is intended to
> be a legally binding signature.
> ============================================================================
> ==
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2