HP3000-L Archives

May 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Re : HP3000 Rebirth - San Diego etc
From:
Noel Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Noel Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 May 1998 21:29:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
And what is wrong with Transact's run time efficiency?  It matches
COBOL.

Nixk D.

John Clogg wrote:
>
> Wait a minute, Faster than COBOL?!?  I assume you mean development
> time, and not run-time efficiency...
>
> >>> Noel Demos <[log in to unmask]> 05/20/98 03:58pm >>>
> Then again there is Transact.  Not as fast as a "VISUAL"
> language, but it has won several language shootouts in the past.
> Not as expensive as COGNOS.
> Easier to learn than Speedware.
> Faster than COBOL.
> AND it is available directly from HP.
> Who could ask for anything more? (yes, it's easy to maintain, too.
>
> Nick D.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2