And what is wrong with Transact's run time efficiency?  It matches
COBOL.

Nixk D.

John Clogg wrote:
>
> Wait a minute, Faster than COBOL?!?  I assume you mean development
> time, and not run-time efficiency...
>
> >>> Noel Demos <[log in to unmask]> 05/20/98 03:58pm >>>
> Then again there is Transact.  Not as fast as a "VISUAL"
> language, but it has won several language shootouts in the past.
> Not as expensive as COGNOS.
> Easier to learn than Speedware.
> Faster than COBOL.
> AND it is available directly from HP.
> Who could ask for anything more? (yes, it's easy to maintain, too.
>
> Nick D.
>
>