And what is wrong with Transact's run time efficiency? It matches COBOL. Nixk D. John Clogg wrote: > > Wait a minute, Faster than COBOL?!? I assume you mean development > time, and not run-time efficiency... > > >>> Noel Demos <[log in to unmask]> 05/20/98 03:58pm >>> > Then again there is Transact. Not as fast as a "VISUAL" > language, but it has won several language shootouts in the past. > Not as expensive as COGNOS. > Easier to learn than Speedware. > Faster than COBOL. > AND it is available directly from HP. > Who could ask for anything more? (yes, it's easy to maintain, too. > > Nick D. > >