HP3000-L Archives

September 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marti Jarsey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marti Jarsey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Sep 1998 09:54:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Is the unremediated code running against production data?  If so, I would
suggest comparing your remediated code against a duplicate, frozen environment.

>>> Rambabu Paturi <[log in to unmask]> 09/26/98 02:12am >>>
Hi All,


 Can any one help us to test a job in power house.

In some jobs QTP,SUP and cobol programs are there and these are updating the
databases.

we are doing testing  by comparing the records selected and records
processed in both the test areas. In one area the unremediated code will be
there(which includes databases and all).The second test area the remediated
code will be there(which include remediated data bases and all) Due to the
updation of data bases and files ,records selection is not consistence with
original code.

How can avoid this, is there any way to rectify it.Or otherwise  there is
any other way to test these jobs for Y2k .


Thanks.
Paturi

______________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2