Sure, Where are the monkey's flying this week....! Ykes if this were only true then we would have had an independent elected for the office of the president back in 1988..
Then this country would have been in the best shape ever with a balanced budget and a strong economy and short hair with dress codes for school grades 1 through 12.
-------------- Original message from Shawn Gordon <[log in to unmask]>: --------------
> I use to be all for an open primary, but what has happened here in
> california against republicans and in other states against democrats
> is that when one party basically has a lock on their nominee, then
> they will vote for the other party and pick the weaker candidate to
> try and put them over the top so that their candidate will be facing
> the weaker candidate, and it totally works. So I'm not so sure I dig
> the open primary so much.
>
> At 10:07 AM 6/5/2006, Art Bahrs wrote:
> >Hi Adam, Brice, Wirt, and Others :)
> > Ok... Sorry, Brice but I don't agree with any of you :) but that is the
> >nice thing here in our country ... we don't have to agree and usually don't
> >:)
> >
> > I have met Wirt and Val ... and they are definitely good people with
> >excellent taste in restuarants and food :) And I relly do read his posts so
> >that I can learn... I may not agree with him... but he does have that nasty
> >habit of quoting facts and sources :) I can read and decide myself.
> >
> > Politically? I doubt Wirt and I agree on very much ... come to think
> >of it... probably very few people agree with me politically! hehehe
> >
> >Now... immgration you don't even want to hear my suggested practices...
> >:)
> >
> > But to give you a fun political one to ponder... I found out recently
> >that there is a move afoot here in Oregon to switch our Primary election
> >from 'closed' to 'open',
> >
> > Our primary elections are closed meaning as a Republican (shocker I
> >know! hehe) I can only vote for Republican candidates if the position is
> >party specific (Judgeships aren't and so on) Democrats can only vote for
> >Democrats... but Libritarians (sp) and other parties can't really vote
> >unless their is one of their candidates is running or something like
> >that... you know the weird concept of equal treatement for all parties...
> >:)
> >
> > Now, personally ever since my Dad helped me plan how I would vote the
> >first time I voted I have questioned Oregon's Primary system and
> >fairness... on the General election I can vote for anyone... why not a
> >truly open Primary? Been asking that one for the last 25 years!
> >
> > Note... the movement here to "open" our primary is not to open it so
> >registered voter could vote for any candidate... but that Libriartiians
> >(sp) can vote for any candidate... the rest of the parties supposedly would
> >still remain closed!
> >
> > um... huh?
> >
> >Art "just to make ya'All think :) " Bahrs
> >
> >=======================================================
> >Art Bahrs, CISSP Information Security The Regence Group
> >(503) 225-4992 FAX (503) 220-3806
> >
> >
> >
> > "Adam
> > Dorritie"
> > > > IL.COM> [log in to unmask]
> > Sent by: cc
> > "HP-3000
> > Systems Subject
> > Discussion" Re: [HP3000-L] OT: GWB's fault
> > > > N.UTC.EDU>
> >
> >
> > 06/05/2006
> > 09:35 AM
> >
> >
> > Please respond
> > to
> > "Adam
> > Dorritie"
> > > > IL.COM>
> > |------------|
> > | [ ] Secure |
> > | E-mail |
> > |------------|
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 6/5/06, Brice Yokem wrote:
> > > 1) You talk about the 'few' responses on this list. I
> > > claim the political viewpoints posted here are not 'few'
> > > and my expressed opinion was not based solely upon the
> > > responses in this thread.
> > >
> > > 2) Can you show me a link where you disagreed with Wirt on some
> > > political subject posted here on this list? And I don't
> > > mean something trivial like if John Kerry turned his eyes
> > > left instead of right during a debate.
> >
> >0) As a side note, I have the same problem with wrap on your e-mail as
> >I did with Michael's
> >
> >1) Even if the entirety of this list were rabid leftists whose hearts
> >bled so much that they required constant resupply, this would be a
> >microscopic portion and completely unrepresentative sample of the set
> >of "liberals." Viva Che!
> >
> >2) Sure. I mentioned my support for the war in Iraq. That's a pretty
> >fundamental difference. Now I think that I was wrong and the cost
> >was disproportionate compared to our benefit, but hindsight is 20-20
> >and at our liberal parties (we have those you know:) I always get
> >uncomfortably silent when folks talk about GWB's move into Iraq. In
> >this thread, I was also castigating Denys for what I perceived was
> >misinformation, but read through and you'll see it. I try not to post
> >just to express my views, but do feel compelled (likely far too often)
> >to express myself when I believe things are being distorted. In the
> >thread below, you'll also find a theme consistent with my posting
> >today-- that I dislike extremists from both sides and have little time
> >for those whose opinions are formulaic rather than cogent.
> >
> >(forgive the length of the link and watch for wrap)
> >http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=Where+Bush+conspiracy+theories+come+from&n
> um=10&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=comp.sys.hp.mpe&as_usubjec
> t=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=5
> &as_maxm=6&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
> >
> >
> >3) To preempt the next question, I offer this: the reason I don't
> >respond to what I often consider Michael's maniacal rants from the
> >left is that there are plenty of others on this list who succeed at
> >expressing my concerns with his posts.
> >
> >By the by, I've never met Wirt (although he seems like an interesting
> >guy and I share his love of good Mexican food having grown up in
> >Orange County, CA). I'm not sure he's a "liberal", to be honest, but
> >he knows far better than either of us.
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >==============================================================================
> >IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachment,
> >contains information that may be confidential or privileged, and is
> >intended solely for the entity or individual to whom it is
> >addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
> >this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> >or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. Nothing in
> >this email, including any attachment, is intended to be a legally
> >binding signature.
> >==============================================================================
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Shawn Gordon
> President
> theKompany.com
> www.thekompany.com
> www.mindawn.com
> 949-713-3276
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
