 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask]>Subject: Re: Proposed Interex Bylaws Amendment >Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:41:54 -0700 > >Joe Geiser wrote: > > > > Stan Sieler writes, > > > > > If a majority of the votes are against it, but not enough people vote, > > > does it still get rejected? > > > > I'm really surprised that there aren't more voices here. The more I >think > > about this, the more cynical I get. > > > > Interex: Someone (Deloy, Leah, Chuck - someone) in there [...]42_24Jun199903:26: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:59:39 EDT |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 06/22/1999 01:26:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> This machine is used for development of terminal emulation software for
> PC's, WBT and CE devices, and currently the system is running using Open
> View on a windows 3.1 (486) machine and although the users can ping the IP
> we can not telent to the sytem. When a telnet conection is attempted, the
> user recieves a conection refused DTC 10 unavailable message. Do to the
> extreme lack of technical documentaiton for this machine, our ITS
department
> has been unable to resolve the problem.
>
Has telnet been re/started on Open View?
|
|
|
