Really gang! Shouldn't the Response Center have been able to figure this out before they told me that the fix was rolled into c.07.21? Anyway a fix is available so I'll be ordering patches. Now if I can just get the RC engineer to return my call! Carl > -----Original Message----- > From: CHEN,TIEN-YOU (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 11:07 AM > To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask] > Cc: CHEN,TIEN-YOU (HP-Cupertino,ex1) > Subject: RE: Re: Performance Problem found (solution?) > > Hi Carl, > > Sorry to disappoint you. > Yes, the IMAGE patch TIXKXL4, fixes the detaching a POSIX file from > XM problem, however, this patch depends on MPEKXH2 patch. Because > of the dependency, we decided to make TIXKXL4 a site specific patch. > That means the fix is not in the later version of IMAGE, in order > word, IMAGE C.07.21 don't have the fix. We will make a > general released version (i.e. dynamically load the new XM procedure) > in the near future. In the meantime, user can order TIXKXL4 and > MPEKXH2 patches for temporary solution. > > Best Regards, > > Tien-You Chen > CSY > > > >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) > > >Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 13:10:55 -0600 > > >Reply-To: Carl McNamee <[log in to unmask]> > > >Sender: HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]> > > >From: Carl McNamee <[log in to unmask]> > > >Subject: Re: Performance Problem found (solution?) > > >Comments: To: Jeff Woods <[log in to unmask]> > > >To: [log in to unmask] > > > > > >A solution is found! HP said that this problem is addressed > > in version > > >C.07.19 of Image! Version C.07.21 is part of power patch 1 > > for 6.0! Hip > > >Hip Hooray!!! > > > > > >Do I sound happy or what! :-) > > > > > >Carl > > > > >