Please forgive me if you got the quoted article below -- I've cancelled it because the Followup-To: header was accidentally removed somehow.. _this_ post should have the correct followup-to set. ugh. Rich [log in to unmask] (Richard J. Rauenzahn) writes: >The 10 or so groups crossposted above are probably not interested in >this (especially ca.unix and comp.unix.*). I've set this followup to be >only comp.sys.hp.hpux. I hope anyone else perpetuating this thread will >do the same... > >Rich -- Rich Rauenzahn [log in to unmask] Hewlett-Packard Company Technical Consultant | I speak for me, | 19055 Pruneridge Ave. Development Alliances Lab| *not* HP | MS 46TU2 IASD / Enterprise Systems Group +--------------+---- Cupertino, CA 95014