Paul is absolutly correct. The number of disk is an issue along with the number of drives on a SCSI channel. Disc drives are getting bigger and cheaper, not faster. A disk will handle upto 30 I/Os per second (disk arrays about 40 I/Os per second). Based on how the data is spread around on the disk it may reach 100 percent utilization around 15 I/Os per second. So if you have some idea what your I/O requirements are you can get an idea of the impact of fewer disk drives will have on your system. The other thing to keep in mind is never mix disk drives with different capacities in the same volume set. MPE will balance the disk space based on a disk drives free space percentage. As files are built they will tend to move to the larger drives and thereby reduce your I/O rate as everything waits on the larger drives. I would add one caution with the statement about adding memory. As a general rule I agree that adding memory is a good thing, but the old addage of "too much of a good thing is bad" is true here as well. Based on how your system is used there is a point that adding memory will slow interactive user performance. We found this when doing performance testing at HP's Capacity Planning Center. It seems the more memory that batch processing has to place with the more it dominates the system and the priority of the user's versus batch has very little to do with who gets cpu time. It become a matter of who has resource locked (in use) when a user needs that resource. I can not give you any idea how much memory is too much. It all depends on your system utilization. But when you hit that magic spot you will know what it is. Kenneth. > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Courry [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 7:48 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Help Choosing Disk Configuration > > The number of physical spindles do make a difference. Also, the number > of > devices on your SCSI card makes a big difference (SE no more than 5, > FW no > more than 10, YMMY.) Also, BUY MORE MEMORY! The less swapping you do > the > better off you are and too many systems are memory starved, even in > these > days of cheap memory. > > > > >The new disk configuration estimate right now will probably be > >increased to 20 to 25g. My question is with 9g drives available, 3 > >of these new drives will fulfill my needs, can I get the same IO > >performance as I do with 7 2g drives? Does having 6 4g drives > >produce more IO/sec (evenly Balanced) than 3 9g drives? With these > >high speed access drives does this issue even an issue anymore with > >the amount of caching done within the operating system? Does the > >number of physical spindles make a difference anymore with todays > >disk technology? Thanks in advance for your comments. > > > >Kimber Renk > > > >