Alan AMBERS wrote: > > The one I have in front of me doesn't have the 937, (it has the 918 > series), but a 928 is a 1.4 (relative to a 918) and a 969/100 rates 4.0. > > If my memory serves me correctly (and it is only single bit error > correcting memory), the 937 would fall between the 1.0 and 1.4. You did not need your single bit error correction routine this time, the 937 is stated at the same 1.0 relative performance rating as the 918. -- **************************************** ** ** ** Chad Gilles ** ** Sr. Software Analyst ** ** ---------------------------------- ** ** American United Life ** ** One American Sq. ** ** Indianapolis, IN 46206-0368 ** ** ---------------------------------- ** ** Ph. 317-263-1423 ** ** Fx. 317-263-1956 ** ** EM. [log in to unmask] ** ** ---------------------------------- ** ** ** ** _/_/_/ _/ _/ ** ** _/ _/ _/ ** ** _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ ** ** _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ ** **_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ ** ** ** ****************************************