Let me see if I can slip this in before we blow the daily posting limit
for HP3000-L :-)

Am I the only one who thinks that August 1998 is a little late to be
crowing about Year 2000 compliance?  I don't think this is something
that we should be spending a lot of effort to point out at this time.
Maybe some oblique reference to "of *course* it's year 2000 compliant"
but in general I think it's time to start looking beyond the year 2000
thing, which is one way of putting the 3000 not only up *to* the new
millennium, but clearly *into* the *next* 1000 years.

G.