So why not convert the LISTF,2 to LISTF,20. The next time this whole
scenario about changing formats comes up, everyone is still going to
say, no, no don't change it, let's made it LISTF,40 or something.

John Zoltak
North American Mfg Co

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael D. Hensley [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 1998 10:21 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [HP3000-L] revised-1) New LISTF Output
>
        <snip>

> No, no, no, no, no!
> Do *NOT* convert your existing script to parse LISTF,20 output.
> That's
> what you did wrong the first time.  If you're going to modify your
> script
> anyway, do it right and switch to using the FINFO function instead!
>
>
> Michael D. Hensley       | mailto:[log in to unmask]
> Allegro Consultants Inc. |
> 408/252-2330             | Visit scenic http://www.allegro.com