Recently Frank Nagy posted a QUERY enhancement request to the Interex sigimage-L reflector. Dave Largent concurred in another post to sigimage-L: >> >> I have a QUERY enhancement request: >> I would like a to see a completion bar or a running index in >> the corner of the screen "100/1000" "200/1000", and or an >> estimated time until completion. >It never ceases to amaze me how many times I "put up" with >something only to have someone later suggest it as an >enhancement request! First of all, thank you to Frank for the enhancement suggestion: It's a goo idea; consider it added to the next SIGIMAGE Enhancement Request List. With respect to posting of SIGIMAGE issues, after the above I got some private email on where they should be sent: Just to 3000-L, the Interex sigimage-L reflector, or both ?? When this question first came up a couple months ago there was an almost unanimous consensus that Image / SIGIMAGE issues were of interest to almost the entire readership of 3000-L. Therefore to avoid duplication of a lot of messages for most people, at that time users were encouraged to post Image threads just to 3000-L. There was in fact just one private dissenting "vote" at that time, compared to a large number of public and private messages that told me "keep it (Image) on 3000-L". Hearing no outcry from the Image community for a change, the above "encouragement" remains in effect.... BTW, please do not take my saying that as chastisement for posting something to sigimage-L; we are happy to receive enhancement requests from all sources, and I will of course continue to read everything that comes across from sigimage-L. But I think IPROF-97 confirms the assumption that HP 3000 users are overwhelmingly Image users: At SIGIMAGE - IPROF, at one point I counted 84 people in the meeting. In that session and also in SIGALLBASE (which was also relatively well attended), I asked a question: "How many people are NOT using TurboIMAGE or Image/SQL at all (i.e.: using only ALLBASE or ORACLE or etc. on the 3000, without Image) ??" Answer: ONE person (who I believe was an ALLBASE tools vendor from Europe). EVERYONE else had some form of Image on their 3000. Note that I am not trying to imply that 3000 users who do not have Image should be ignored; they should not. Just that the "set" of 3000 users is only very slightly larger than the "set" of 3000 Image users. Therefore 3000-L still seems to be the most appropriate forum for Image issues, without duplicating all of those posts to sigimage-L. The Interex reflectors are clearly the right vehicle for many of the other SIGs whose focus is a smaller percentage of the 3000 user base. My $.25 worth, Ken Sletten SIGIMAGE Chair