On Sat, 6 Jan 1996 00:57:55 GMT Netnews Server said: >There has been a lot of discussion regarding QUERYCM vs. QUERYNM. I would >like to raise two points: Interesting choice of words. When QUERYNM became available, my solution was to :rename query,querycm and :rename querynm,query and wait for somebody to complain. They never did. I don't know that I would have been as brave (back then) to replace QUERY with a symbolic link to querynm, but it's the same philosophy (assuming that they saved a copy of query(cm) somewhere). Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>