On Tue, 25 Jul 1995, Steve Cole wrote: > I personally have no problem with the omission of MPE from the list. From > my experience MPE has just supported a lot of business while other > technologies have been evaluated. I have seen success with other > technologies but a lot more failures. Okay, then I'm sure you took the time (not a trivial investment) to fill in your responses and mail them back. But unless I missed something, there wasn't anything said about sharing the results! We all share a common base in technology -- the HP 3000. It seems fair to me that someone should give back to those who provide answers to their questions. Using an environment that is common to the list provides a better chance that we will understand what is communicated. Of course, there are no guarantees! That said, I hope I have the opportunity to pay each of you back two fold for the information you have provided me! Regards, --- John Joerger ([log in to unmask]) --- Press-Telegram (Long Beach)