A brief clarification on the VT ghost session problem on 5.0 Push, with excerpts from Eero (with his permission)... ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- - Another word about those VT ghosts on 5.0... I don't think I stated it in my posting - d*** it, I should have! Anyway, that problem is higly unlikely to be seen. I would estimate that >95% of the systems out there will never see the problem. Going back to this ghost server problem, the only system to see the problem here was a 995-800 running in high-speed test ring consisting of 995's, 4-way kittyhawks and some 987-200's. These systems are linked together with fast links such as FDDI. The 995-800 was having trouble keeping up with a Kittyhawk pounding it over FDDI... None of our low-speed rings ever saw the problem. Low speed rings run CPU's such as 917/937/947/918/928/935 and even MPE/V s70. I guess the point I'm making is that hopefully I did not create panic with the posting -- this problem is unlikely to be seen -- people can update to 5.0 even without having the patch and most systems will be fine. You may post parts of this to decrease net's concerns about ghost VT's on 5.0 push if you wish Cheers, Eero.