Tony Furnivall ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > Thanks for your blast-o-gram. The whole intent is to GATHER the content. As > these issues are received they frquently come in with a sparse definition. We > wanted to tap the collective wisdom of you all to see just what the request > might be about. I'm not sure you got Steve's point about stuffing everying in the subject line rather than in the message text. I too use rtin (newsreader) and many of your subject lines were truncated to the point where they didn't make any sense. I found that I could read the entire subject line by doing a followup (but not actually posting the message) so I could read the header within the text editor (which doesn't truncate). No offense meant here. Just though you'd like to know for future reference. Jeff Lindberg, Data Processing Coordinator --- Mississippi Bend Area Education Agency ([log in to unmask]) 729 21st Street Bettendorf, IA 52722 "I am Homer of Borg. Prepare to be assimilat... Oooo, Donuts!"