According to Isaac Blake: > > What I did want to bring forward is the problem with NS/VT relative to the > client. Many of our users had noticed performance problems using NS/VT over > their old DTC connections. In testing we found a 19.2K DTC connection out > performed the NS/VT almost every time from a PC. > > HOWEVER, AND THIS IS IMPORTANT, accessing the same 3000 on the same subnet using > vt3k on the our workstations the NS/VT performance was equal or slightly better > than the DTC performance. > > So remember in your research to take this into consideration... > That is interesting, we have found with 486 PCs that NS/VT outperforms a DTC everytime for DOS based terminal emulators like Advancelink or ms92. We have been moving to WFWG 3.11 and win92 (using Microsoft's tcp-ip-32), we still get good performance, but it isn't nearly as fast as it was using Dos, with windows is it more like the DTCs. We have DTC/48 and one lanic all on the same network (until just last week when we broke up the network into separate nets with bridging - the performance info comes from before the breakup - it is too soon to know how the separate nets compare). Has anyone tried 38.4 on the new DTCs? -- -- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - - Richard Gambrell | Internet: [log in to unmask] Mgr. Tech. Services | POT: 504-483-7454 FAX: 504-482-1561 Xavier University of LA | Smail: 7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125