According to Stan Sieler: > > Richard Gambrell ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > > : Some of us, like me, just don't get to doing these thing proactively --- > : so we will be up to our neck when we need the password and we can't > : get it quickly. > > Luckily, the passwords are not site specific. :) > > Nonetheless, *WHY* have we accepted this situation? > > SS > IF we haven't signed the agreement, we could have trouble getting the passwordks quickly - or get someone in trouble for giving them to us. HP will only have *real* control over this if they move to site-specific passwords. There should be a better solution to this problem. Why doesn't the "unsupported" status of these utilities protect HP from misuse of them by us -- if that is what this is about? Or, am I missing something? -- -- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - - Richard Gambrell | Internet: [log in to unmask] Mgr. Tech. Services | POT: 504-483-7454 FAX: 504-482-1561 Xavier University of LA | Smail: 7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125