We have been told alot during the last election cycle.
However hardly the truth. ;->
But then again, "politicians"  and "truth" ==> 2 worlds collide

Michael


On Fri, 6 May 2005 15:04:06 -0500, Denys Beauchemin
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Well, there's that explanation, of course.
>
>But what really confused me is that we have been told that pollution is the
>cause of global warming.
>
>We have also been told that tax cuts decrease revenue to the government.
>
>Finally, we have also been told during the last election cycle that the US
>was losing jobs at an appalling rate.   (Actually, we were told that tax
>cuts were causing job losses and that not signing Kyoto would increase
>pollution.)
>
>Denys
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:52 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Friday humor (or boy, am I confused now.)
>
>Denys writes:
>
>> http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050502/full/050502-8.html
>>
>>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2005/05/04/AR2005050402
>>  134.html
>
>I suspect your confusion is due to the fact that one story is about the
>changing transmissivity of light through the Earth's atmosphere and the
>other is
>that tax receipts are likely to exceed expectations. The two stories are
>just
>hard to mesh into one comprehensive worldview, so your confusion is
somewhat
>
>natural and to be expected.
>
>Wirt Atmar
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *