Mr Yokem, yes, I would just be as upset. does this answer your question? Now I'd like an answer: are you upset with the way the peacefull and non-agressive freedom-of- speech is handled by or in the name of the president? Michael On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 20:32:02 -0500, Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Mr Yokem, >why is everything about Bill Clinton? You seem to use him in a positive way >or even quote him when it fits and use him negative otherwise. > >----------------------- > >Mr Baier, > >Answer my question. Would you be as upset if this guy held up a >sign like 'Remember Vince Foster' at a Bill Clinton get-together >when he was president, and was then sequestered by the police? > >I can tell you I am of two minds on this. > >1) I believe in the 1st Amendment > >2) I also do not want it easy to make an assasination attempt on >the President. > >From what I see here it looks like the authorities were overreacting, >but then we are in a higher level of crisis than in previous times, >the press does not always report everything and I am uncertian if >Michael will conveniently leave soemthing out. > >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, * >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html * * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, * * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *