It's still frustrating. We already _have_ the hardware -- we had our N4000 up and into production the week after the EOL announcement, and we had our A400 up for our developers by the end of January 2002 -- but our A400 is still crippled. It's got a 440Mhz chip that is scaled back to 110Mhz. Why not offer those of us who've already contributed to the revenue stream a 'performance kicker' and allow that box to operate at the full 440Mhz clock speed? george Stachnik wrote: > Alfredo says: > >>George doesn't seriously believe that the A-Class >>qualifies as having "enough processing power to carry customers >>through the next five years", does he? >> > > I didn't say that. What I actually said was: > >>there would be hardware available with enough processing >>power to carry customers through the next five years." >> > > This refers to both the a-class *and* the n-class, and in particular > to the new models that we're introducing on Thursday's webcast. > It does not imply anything else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- John MacLerran IT Systems Analyst email: [log in to unmask] Idaho State University V(208) 282-2954 http://www.isu.edu/~macljohn F(208) 282-3673 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, * * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *