Keep in mind that this will also likely change the model number that the 3000 reports to applications. This could blow third-party software dead because some of them include the model number in the license-enabling hash algorithm (where you call them with the model number and package ID and they give you a long key to put in a file). One of ours went from a 989-300 to a 989-400 when we added a processor. "John Clogg" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message news:ac0vm9022f4@enews3.newsguy.com... > Sylvia asks: > >Does anybody know if I need to add more memory to support the new > processor? > > No, nobody knows, despite any claims to the contrary. The answer depends > entirely on your environment - how many jobs & sessions you typically run, > and what they are doing. I would recommend an evaluation of your present > environment using Glance or the Lund tools or the services of a performance > consultant. If you are experiencing any memory pressure now, it will get > worse with an additional processor. If you are not seeing memory pressure, > then it is less certain that you will/will not need more memory. > > * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, * > * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html * > * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, * * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *