Hi Michael,

The 3000 is a GREAT machine.  In 27 years, it hasn't let me down.  My PCs,
on the other hand, do that a couple of times a day.  So I share your
sentiments about the 3000's reliability.  However, as much as we'd like, it
cannot be an island in today's world.  Interoperability has been, and will
continue to be, one of the keys to its continued longevity.

Here I go, preaching to the choir, but evangelism is one of the other keys.

Frank Gribbin
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP

Live Long and Prosper (the original LLP)_


On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:33:42 -0500, Michael Anderson
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>I know, but the reliability is much higher when a PC is not part of the
process.
>I hate to reduce my highly reliable MPE machine to depend on the
reliability of
>a PC, only when I have no other option.
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *