Jeff notes: > We were sort of "forced" to move to host-based telnet after > we ran above the limit of 40 sessions on our DTC TAC (or > 80 depending on the model). At the end of our 960's life we > were running 100+ host based sessions on 5.5 (latest > patches) and no obvious degradation. > > If you haven't tried it lately, give it a shot. I did have somewhat > of a bumpy introduction, especially in beta, but has matured > rather beautifully. The number of host-based TELNET sessions we run on our 959-400 is small enough that it's not a fair test of anything (all end-users access the 3000 with our in-house client); I have never noticed TELNET putting any significant load on our 3000.... I will just add that I *think* the 6.5 EXP/PP-2 TELNET includes support for Advanced TELNET.. For QCTerm users, this is another good reason to go to host-based... Ken Sletten