> > If this item is not already on SIGMPE enhancement request > > list, I request make it so.... such an obviously good idea that > > no discussion should be necessary, IMO.... > > other than, perhaps, if this enhancement were implemented it > could break existing UDCs and scripts. oops.... of course what I *MEANT* to add was that it might need to include a way to set a flag (don't hit me, Wirt) to continue the current behavior.... > > .... which leads to a larger question left-over from HPW-00: > > Any prospect at least some of the "Small effort" items might > > get done any time soon ??... > > stay tuned ;) > > Jeff Vance, CSY I note with great interest and anticipation that one trailing ";)" thanks, :-) , Ken Sletten