> > If this item is not already on SIGMPE enhancement request
> > list, I request make it so....  such an obviously good idea that
> > no discussion should be necessary, IMO....
>
> other than, perhaps, if this enhancement were implemented it
> could break existing UDCs and scripts.

oops.... of course what I *MEANT* to add was that it might
need to include a way to set a flag (don't hit me, Wirt) to
continue the current behavior....


> > ....  which leads to a larger question left-over from HPW-00:
> > Any prospect at least some of the "Small effort" items might
> > get done any time soon ??...
>
> stay tuned ;)
>
>  Jeff Vance, CSY

I note with great interest and anticipation that one trailing ";)"

thanks,
:-) ,
Ken Sletten