On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:58:45 -0400, Huw Porter <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:46:13 -0400, Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >>Thanks. I wrote it tonight. >> > >You mean this morning! <wink> I think he mean tomorrow night. <BG> > >Listserv trivia Qn: Do the times that are reported on postings >reflect the current time in Chatanooga (sic), (where Raven is >physically located, right? Nope, it depends on the clock on the POSTING AGEMT. For example, even though you said you're at GMT +0900, your post shows GMT -0400. On the other hand, Strike's posts show GMT +1000 (are you sure you are both in Sidney and 1 hr apart? Didn't think Sidney is THAT big, or your local posting agents that far apart. :-)) By the same token, when the Krazy Kiwi posts, it depends on the POSTING AGENT she uses at the time. It sometimes shows -0400, sometimes +0800, ... , she's everywhere. :-) Sherry's posts show GMT +1200. Thus, before TODAY (here GMT -0400) is over, I'll be seeing Strike's posts dated TOMORROW May 30. :-) >) And if so, what is the time difference between that and GMT? Chattanooga is GMT -0400 >Cheers, >Huw >-- >Sydney, Australia, 9 hours ahead of GMT >www.huwporter.com You are really GMT +1000, I sink. :-) In the voice of Brian Gelfand the Arrogant playing in his sandbox: "Who cares"? Judging from this thread alone, not to mention the original thread in which his Clueless Newbieness showed, I guess at least a few of the regulars do care, if not only for the sake of INTELLECTUAL curiosity. -- Bob.