Netbase works well once you've got the initial setup done. However, the setup is tedious as hell and doesn't allow for much error. Jesse Jeffrey Kubler <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message news:F4B1826B1A21D211AEC5006008207AF404378119@dogbert.csillc.com... > Alan, > I believe you will find 3 products on the map for this type of replication. > The Quest product (NETBASE) is by far the most prominent. Lund has a tool > it took over from Carolian called Shadow and there is a third called > BackChat? I have experience with the first two. The NETBASE has the most > functionality altough my understanding is that Lund is working on > enhancements to make the Shadow product on par with NETBASE. One drawback > (or it could be an advantage) is that Shadow relies upon image logging. You > will find NETBASE in numerous installations. Shadow hadn't been aggressively > marketed so most of its sights are older, but steady (and proud of it!). I > don't know that much about Backchat. > Thanks, > Jeff Kubler > Kubler Consulting,Inc. > >From: "Heter, Alan" <[log in to unmask]> > >Reply-To: "Heter, Alan" <[log in to unmask]> > >To: [log in to unmask] > >Subject: Data Replication > >Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:28:18 -0700 > > > >I am currently working on a project that will require data replication > >software. I would like to hear testimonials of good or bad of experiences > >with different software packages. We are currently evaluating QUEST > >NetBase > >Shadowing, among other alternatives. Has anyone using this package noticed > >significant impacts on performance? If you would like to take this off list > >feel free to email me at the address below. > > > >Alan Heter > >Senior Programmer Analyst - Information Systems > >Alliant Foodservice - Minneapolis > >2864 Eagandale Boulevard > >Eagan, MN 55121 > >(651) 683-4206 > >(651) 683-4438 fax > >e-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com >