In article <[log in to unmask]>
, Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]> writes
>> > Yeah, that "e" needs to be in there - and BEFORE we hit IA64.
>
>HP 3000 - The E-Business Server
>or
>HP 3000 - The Business E-Server
>or even
>HP 3000 - The E-Business E-Server
>

Well, as Carly F was telling me the other day, HP are into *e-services*.
This will differentiate HP from its would-be competitors in a way that
'e-business' and 'e-commerce' won't.

Makes sense. As the Internet segues from technology-driven to customer-
focussed (and it still has a way to go) the term 'e-services' is going
to send the right signals to providers and users alike.

Anyway, the latest ad, right on-message, has 'the HP 3000 Business
Server' which is 'easily integrated into an e-services environment'.

--
Roy Brown     'Yep, that sure is an exciting vision of the future.
Kelmscott Ltd  Now tell me again, Marvin, why I'm getting a bollocking
               for trying to use these new-fangled Image B-trees?'