Carl,
I am probably out of my depth here, but have you considered
if XM may be the bottleneck ?
Tad.

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl McNamee <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 02 November 1999 16:03
Subject: Re: Performance question


>Ouch!  I bet that hurt.  We do have Netbase but the databases in question
>are not being shadowed.  We do not use HP's Mirror/iX product but these
>databases do reside on an EMC mirrored disks.  The Symm Manager software
>that monitors the EMC box is showing very little disk activity.
>
>
>
>Carl
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony Summers [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 3:28 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Performance question
>
>
>Re Image performance.
>
>Just a thought - are these databases being shadowed by Netbase,
> Shareplex or Disk Mirroring ?
>
>We once had a situation where we were loading a database far faster
>than Netbase could empty its own message files - and, once the primary
>message file was full, the main process was impeded until Netbase caught
up.
>
>
>Best of Luck.
>