HP3000-L Archives

October 1999, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Patch/iX and Stage/iX
From:
Lee Gunter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lee Gunter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Oct 1999 09:38:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines) 
Common sense tells me that I'd never veto a patch because is wasn't stageable.
My comment was more of a "maybe if I say it, it will eventually come true" kind
of statement.       :-)  :-)

Lee Gunter




From: Lars Appel <[log in to unmask]> on 10/30/99 02:57 AM

Please respond to Lars Appel <[log in to unmask]>


To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:    (bcc: Lee Gunter/BCBSO/TBG)
Subject:  Re: [HP3000-L] Patch/iX and Stage/iX




Lee wrote...

>I agree.  Too bad this can't be done for PowerPatches and platform releases.

Well, it works for PowerPatches *if* you decide to veto those few
patches from the PowerPatch bundle that are not stage-able. Patch/iX
will show a "stage yes/no" column after doing the full qualification
and give you a chance to skip those patches that you don't want/like
because you prefer the faster stage-installation.

Your milage may vary.

Lars.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2