HP3000-L Archives

September 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Slover, Martin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Slover, Martin
Date:
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:11:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Sheesh!!!! Do you know if HP is an ISO9000 company or not? They should at
least get themselves some standards in labeling.

Max...



-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Sieler [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 2:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: PowerPatch/Power Patch/Powerpatch/POWERPATCH/???


Hi,

Just out of curiousity, I looked at some PowerPatch tapes to
see how to spell "PowerPatch".

I have five (5!) "powerpatch" tapes for 5.5 on my desk:

    Name on tape          What power patch #?

    MPE/iX PowerPatch             2
    MPE iX Power Patch            3            (yes, missing "/")
    MPE/iX POWERPATCH             4
    MPE/iX POWER PATCH            5
    MPE/iX Powerpatch 6           6

Not only is "PowerPatch" spelled 5 different ways (even ignoring the "/"
on PP 3 and the "6" on PP6), the *subtitle* is different on *EVERY* tape!
(PP/iX, POWER PATCH, Power Patch Only, Power Patch/iX, 5.5 PowerPatch,
respectively)

Sheesh.  That's embarassing.

I was just trying to determine the "official" spelling of PowerPatch...
guess I'll just have to decide myself :)

Ok...I've decided on PowerPatch!

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                         http://www.allegro.com/sieler/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2