Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 1999 08:54:18 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It is definitely Common Business Oriented Language.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendell E Gragg [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 8:38 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Cobol
>
> Well, maybe this will put this baby to rest. According to the IBM
> Dictionary of Computing, 10th Ed., Cobol stands for Common Business
> Oriented Language. The earliest versions were Cobol 60 and 61.
>
> Wendell
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, RON HORNER wrote:
>
> > Easy Nick. That was what I learned. Go pick a fight with my computer
> > teachers.
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > Ron Horner
> > Operations Manager
> > Administrative Management Group
> > [log in to unmask]
> > (847) 870-2175
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nick Demos [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 10:14 AM
> > To: RON HORNER
> > Cc: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: PowerPatch/Power
> Patch/Powerpatch/POWERPATCH/???
> >
> >
> >
> > RON HORNER wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry to correct but it's Common Oriented Business Language
> > >
> > Ron, since when? "Common Oriented". What does that mean?
> >
> > It is "Common Business Oriented Language" Therefore CoBOL.
> >
> > I am sure others on the list will support me on this.
> >
> > Nick D.
> >
>
> Wendell E. Gragg Socorro Independent School District
> HP Library Systems Specialist El Paso Tx
> [log in to unmask]
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> ^Liberal: One who believes that having self esteem is more important ^
> ^than doing something to warrant it! ^
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
|
|
|