Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 24 Sep 1999 15:16:10 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Re:
>
> Mark Klein writes:
>
> > Sym C H X P Sym Sym Sym Lset
> > Name Type Scope Value Name
> > ---- - - - - ---- ----- ----- ----
> > alloc_code_space 3 3 2 entry univ 00022000
> >
> > In the above listing, note the X and P columns. That indicates the
> > execution privilege level and the call privilege level of the routines.
> > (Execution privilege level is what ring it will run at, call level is what
> > ring the calling routine must run in order to call this routine). So, in
> > the above example, alloc_code_space is callable by user mode (ring 3), but
> > runs at privileged ring 2.
>
> I'm a bit confused by this, but I may know why.
>
> Restating the above, it appears:
>
> X == execution privilege == "callable by" ring
>
> P == call privilege == "runs at" ring
>
> Is this correct?
Yes. My notes say "X = "XLEAST" (the least privileged you can be and
still be able to call the procedure). (Note, of course, that 0 is most
privileged, and 3 is least privileged.)
> If so, my confusion stemmed from equating "execution" with "runs at",
> and "call" with "callable by".
Yes.
--
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]
http://www.allegro.com/sieler/
|
|
|