I've got an HP9000 running HPUX 9.04 with the following
"uptime".  It's just been replaced with an NT box, however,
even after alerting folks that they probably won't be
seeing uptimes like this on the new system!

  9:37am  up 770 days, 16:20,  2 users,  load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00

Frank Letts wrote:
>
> I just had to follow up on Lars' post.  Does anyone have an
> example of a UNIX or any microsoft system that you could
> make that statement about?  I doubt it, but will listen for
> responses.  Plenty of 1000 & 3000 stories to go around, I'll
> bet none from the "modern" camp.
>
> Frank Letts (aka 'Fast Frank')
> http://freeweb.pdq.net/fbt1
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ----------
> > From: Lars Appel <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: predictive support question
> > Date: Thursday, June 03, 1999 9:39 AM
> >
> > Jim wrote...
> >
> > >SYSTEM START TIME             --  SUN, OCT 18, 1998,  9:09 PM
> > >LAST ERROR CHECK TIME         --  WED, JUN  2, 1999,  3:46 PM
> >
> > Hmmm. Too sad that memory replacement will require a reboot.
> >
> > ;-) Lars