HP3000-L Archives

May 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 12 May 1999 09:21:49 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1105 bytes) , vcard.vcf (425 bytes)
As far as I know, the 949 does not support Y2K. The information comes from a
french official HP3000 resellers right here and is dated November '97.
Another HP3000 resellers faxed me a document telling that the 949 has not been
tested in a Y2K context, and that its end of support date was 11/98.
Sorry Kevin for the bad news, but I think you should worry urgently about that.
Anyway, hope this will help

Kevin Young a écrit:

> At some point in the past I was told that my 3000/949 would not have any
> Year 2000 issues and that all I needed to worry about was the operating
> system and any applications.  So, I've upgraded to MPE/iX 5.5 Powerpatch 6
> and currently testing the Y2K modifications made to the only application we
> have running on the 3000 (ManMan).  As I was wandering around on HP's
> Year2000 site I stumbled upon a page that listed the 949 as not being
> compliant.
>
> So what is the real scoop?  I was under the impression that anything with
> the PA-RISC architecture was OK.  Is HP just saying it is not compliant
> since they no longer support it?
>
> Thanks in advance to anyone who knows the answer.





ATOM RSS1 RSS2