Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 14 May 1999 09:31:57 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Donna :)
If Disc Usage and Storage figures are what you want to get... what about
using something like the accounting feature in Netware? Only base it off of a
Report @.@?
I used to do this... I would import the output from a Report into a FoxPro
database and then do reports on which group/acct was using what... also tracked
logon time and cpu seconds to a degree...
There was also a program way back when from Boeing I think... that would
allow you (as Manager.SYS) to assign values or charges per function such as CPU
Seconds Used or Sectors of storage being used and so on...
Art "I Need a Weekend!" Bahrs
P.S. I always hated the disc limits I had in college! I was forever having to
find ways around it! hehehe
----------
>From: Donna Garverick <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: account limits
>Date: Thu, 13 May, 1999, 15:31
>
> Nick Demos wrote:
>
>> You have ot said WHY you want to use limits on a production
>> machine.
>> Typically, limits are used to keep programmers "honest", to clean
>> up unused files, not hog the system, etc. But on a production
>> machine? To what end?
>
> well, it's to make the folks reponsible for the applications (and
> data) own up to how much disc space they're actually using.
> currently, the mpe admins monitor gross disc capacity -- how much
> free space is left on this or that private volume. since i've been
> working for longs, i've done two 50% disc increases on this box and
> the pattern seems to be continuing. because of y2k, we've had a disc
> (mech) explosion. our cio is, rightfully, concerned about all this
> disc and doesn't really want to buy anymore unless we absolutely have
> to -- unless it's requested by the applications folk. in the past,
> applications was required to submit a projected disc budget. we
> haven't been doing that but will be again. hth - d
>
> --
> Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
> 925-210-6631 [log in to unmask]
>
>>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
|
|
|