HP3000-L Archives

April 1999, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:16:51 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Scott writes:

> The :ABORTPROCESS enhancement for MPE is not being implemented like
> "kill -9" and will not be "enhanced" to be that way in the near term.

Great!

> In MPE there is a very simple memchanism used to protect system data
> structure
> integrity. It is called setcritical/resetcritical. System code does a
...
> Bottom line, :ABORTPROCESS will not abort any process that is critical.
> Period.

Excellent.


<plug>
Same logic as SHOT's KILL command, which is over 9 YEARS old now.
Short description at http://www.lund.com/sysmantb.html
</plug>

> If you do a subsequent :ABORTPROCESS [then] it will tell you there
> is an "ABORT PENDING".

That's a good idea...I'll add it to SHOT :)

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2